Clarifying user requests

\n

When the user makes a simple request, I want to ensure I'm being helpful and addressing their needs. Since there’s no code or repository context, I should offer a translation and ask if they’d like a summary or a write-up. If the request is ambiguous, asking a clarifying question is important. I could provide a translation and offer some background on Reguilón, Inter Miami, and MLS roster rules. It might also help to mention checking official announcements if browsing was enabled.Checking for user verification

I can suggest to the user that I check reputable sources for verification, but I’ll need to clarify if I have web access approval. The guidelines say I can ask to browse, but it isn't always necessary. If the user wants verification, I can provide a neutral response like, [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;Nice! If confirmed, here's what it could mean,[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; along with a quick background. I’ll keep it concise and offer bullet points, options like verification, a profile, fit/tactics, roster rules, or a translation of the sentence about Reguilón.Providing concise information

I need to keep my final response concise and friendly. I’ll acknowledge the user’s request, provide the translation, and include a disclaimer about verification status. Then, I can offer optional next steps, inviting them to ask for more details if they're interested. It’s important to keep the tone light and welcoming without using any complicated commands or shells. Let’s go ahead and put that all together!